The Actual Lesson of the Parable of the Sadhu

Relating to different interpretations on a topic, it’s fascinating that many enterprise ethics textbooks comprise The Parable of the Sadhu, about how these Westerners wrestled with the implications of a freezing Indian mendicant Sadhu. In abstract, the creator had been beating himself up for years as a result of on a visit to Nepal to climb within the Himalayan Mountains he and different climbers had come throughout a freezing mendicant mendacity uncovered within the mountains. They revived him and left him in a hut, final seeing him throwing rocks at a canine. For years thereafter the creator suffered from guilt, feeling that he ought to have helped to hold the Sadhu all the way down to a village a two-day stroll away.

What the story doesn’t say, in fact, is that the Sadhu had been precisely the place he meant to be, doing what he meant to do, when immediately these Westerners grabbed and manhandled him, after which flip his presence into some grave ethical disaster for themselves.  To high it off, they left him to be eaten by a canine; as a substitute of dying peacefully on the mountain he will get to be torn to items and eaten. Not a really pleased ending for the Sadhu.


This appears typical of interactions between People and the remainder of the world.  Nowhere did the Sadhu seem to have requested for anybody to assist him.  The creator interprets the lesson of the Sadhu to be “In a fancy company state of affairs, the person requires and deserves the help of the group.”  The lesson I see, as a substitute, is: Watch out round Westerners, they could seize you, manhandle you, and take you someplace you don’t have any curiosity in being taken, to be torn to items by canines.  A Syrian buddy of mine despatched me an image of a bumper sticker apparently changing into widespread within the Center East: “Be Good to America–Or we’ll deliver democracy to your nation.” 


The true query we ought to be asking ourselves, due to this fact, earlier than getting concerned within the inside affairs of different international locations or the day-to-day affairs of different folks, is whether or not what we suggest to do going to assist or hurt the opposite folks.  If we assume the reply to that query, then we’ll proceed to make the error made by the creator of the Parable; that something we do to another person is justified as a result of it’s we who’re doing it.  I recommend that this presumption is itself unjustified and unjustifiable.

Source by Paul Croushore

    Add your comment

    Your email address will not be published.